A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate legal funding for migrant children. The order temporarily blocks a funding cut that could have left many children without legal representation in immigration proceedings.
Nonprofit groups argued that the funding cut would leave children vulnerable to deportation, citing a 2008 anti-human trafficking law that requires the government to provide legal representation to minors “to the greatest extent practicable.”
The court’s order will expire on April 16, with a final decision to follow, while the Department of Health and Human Services has yet to comment on the ruling.
Full Story
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate legal funding for migrant children who come to the United States alone. The ruling, issued Wednesday, April 2, temporarily blocks the administration’s order from last month.
What is the response to the judge’s order?
Nonprofit groups said the funding cut could cause thousands of children to lose access to their attorneys. The groups said this gives children a disadvantage in immigration proceedings, making them more likely to be deported.
The government argued that the funding was discretionary and not required to give the children legal representation.
But the judge said ending the funding meant the government potentially violated its duty to protect children from human trafficking.
The nonprofits cited a 2008 anti-human trafficking law, which states the government must, to the “greatest extent practicable,” provide legal representation to minors.
According to the groups’ complaint, children represented by the nonprofits arrived in the U.S. to escape violence and poverty and most don’t speak English and can’t afford hiring a lawyer.
Ella and the staff at Clear Media Project (CMP) curate these articles.
Unless otherwise noted CMP does not write these articles.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the articles published on this blog belong solely to the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the blog owner. The blog owner does not claim ownership of the content shared by contributors and is not responsible for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions.
All rights and credits goes to its rightful owners. No Copyright Infringement is intended. If you believe any content infringes on your rights, please contact us for review and potential removal.
