Pro-Israel group calls on AG to investigate Ms. Rachel for Gaza posts
Ella Greene April 10, 2025 0
- YouTube star Ms. Rachel is facing calls for a federal investigation after posting about children killed in Gaza. A pro-Israel group claims her content may amount to paid foreign propaganda, though there is no evidence that Ms. Rachel has been paid by any person or entity.
- The controversy has reignited debates around influencers posting about global conflicts and potential ties to foreign interests.
- Ms. Rachel has previously stated that her interest in advocacy work began when she saw a video of a Palestinian child who survived an airstrike in Gaza.
Full Story
YouTube star Ms. Rachel is facing scrutiny over her recent Gaza posts. A pro-Israel group is calling for a federal investigation into whether her content amounts to paid foreign propaganda, though there is no evidence that Ms. Rachel has been paid by any person or entity.
The group, StopAntisemitism, sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for an inquiry into Ms. Rachel’s recent social media activity according to the New York Post. They argue her videos may have violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), a law requiring individuals paid by foreign governments to disclose that relationship.
Although there is no public evidence that Ms. Rachel — whose full name is Rachel Griffin Accurso — received any payment, the request for an inquiry has ignited a broader conversation. Questions are mounting about influencers, foreign interests, and how platforms like TikTok and Instagram are being used to shape public opinion around the war in Gaza.
Posts that prompted calls to investigate
Ms. Rachel, best known for her educational YouTube series for toddlers, posted a video on TikTok in December 2024 talking about the number of child deaths in Gaza since the war broke out. That video alone received more than 14,000 comments, with many users praising her for speaking out. A few others questioned the post, asking why she didn’t also highlight Israeli victims.
She also collaborated on a March 2025 video with a friend she says lost his home in Gaza. In another recent post with World Food Programme USA, Ms. Rachel spotlighted food insecurity in four regions, including Gaza.
The advocacy group StopAntisemitism took issue with these posts. In their letter, they wrote: “Given the vast sums of foreign funds that have been directed toward propagandizing our young people on college campuses, we suspect there is a similar dynamic in the online influencer space.”
While Ms. Rachel hasn’t spoken publicly about the recent allegations, she has said in previous interviews that her interest in advocacy began when she saw a video of a child who had survived an airstrike in Gaza. Speaking to The Independent, Ms. Rachel said, “The look in his eyes has stayed in my mind. No child should experience that kind of fear, shock and terror.”
Similarly, while promoting a fundraiser on Instagram in May 2024, Ms. Rachel said she “care[s] deeply for all children,” adding, “Palestinian children, Israeli children, children in the US – Muslim, Jewish, Christian children – all children, in every country. Not one is excluded.”
Claims of misinformation
StopAntisemitism also accused Ms. Rachel of spreading misinformation. One example they cited was her sharing of an image showing a severely malnourished child with protruding limbs. Without providing any evidence, the group claimed the child had cystic fibrosis, and was not suffering from starvation.
The Washington Post, meanwhile, quoted the boy’s mother as saying he suffers from both starvation and cystic fibrosis.
A larger pattern of influencer involvement
Ms. Rachel is far from the only influencer caught in the crosshairs of this issue. The Jerusalem Post reported in 2023 that around five dozen individuals claiming to be independent journalists were participating in what the outlet called a propaganda campaign against Israel. Together, they reached over 100 million social media followers.
One prominent example was Plestia Alaqad, a journalist with more than 4 million followers. She posted a video about an October 2023 bombing at Gaza’s Al-Ahli Hospital, claiming it killed more than 1,000 people. The Jerusalem Post cited international investigations estimating fewer than 50 deaths.
However, The Associated Press reported conflicting numbers. Gaza’s health ministry originally claimed 500 people were killed, later revising the toll to 471. U.S. intelligence estimates range from 100 to 300 casualties. Responsibility for the blast remains disputed.
Coordinated campaigns on both sides
The controversy around Ms. Rachel’s Gaza posts is unfolding amid broader revelations of online influence campaigns. In May 2024, The New York Times reported that Meta and OpenAI had disrupted a covert operation originating in Israel. That campaign used AI-generated content and hundreds of fake accounts posing as Americans to push pro-Israel messaging toward U.S. lawmakers.
The report said Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs had earmarked $2 million for the campaign. However, the ministry denied any involvement.
Controversy around StopAntisemitism
StopAntisemitism argues that Ms. Rachel’s Gaza posts may violate federal law if she was compensated in any way by foreign groups.
The group has garnered controversy in the past with its ‘Antisemite of the Week’ posts. Climate activist Greta Thunberg and rapper Macklemore have booth been featured.
However, while they acknowledge Ms. Rachel is entitled to her personal opinions, they maintain that transparency is key — especially when someone with her reach speaks on international issues.
Related Stories
Ella Rae Greene, Editor In Chief
Ella Greene
Ella and the staff at Clear Media Project (CMP) curate these articles.
Unless otherwise noted CMP does not write these articles.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the articles published on this blog belong solely to the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the blog owner. The blog owner does not claim ownership of the content shared by contributors and is not responsible for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions.
All rights and credits goes to its rightful owners. No Copyright Infringement is intended. If you believe any content infringes on your rights, please contact us for review and potential removal.